Chapter:

Section-Officer-Model-Exam56

based on following passage
Modern economies does not differentiate between renewable and non-renewable materials, as its method is to measures everything by means of a money price. Thus, taking various alternative fuels, like coal, oil, wood or water power: only difference between m recognised by modern economics is relative cost per equivalent unit. The cheapest is automatically one to be preferred, as to do orwise would be irrational and 'uneconomic'. From a Buddhist point of view of course this will not do, essential difference between non-renewable fuels like coal and oil on one hand and renewable fuels like wood and water power on or cannot be simply overlooked. Non-renewable goods must be used only if y are indespensible, and n only with greatest care and highest concern for conservation. To use m carelessly or extravagantly is an act of violence, and while complete non-violence may not be possible on earth, it is noneless duty of man to aim at deal of non-violence in all he does
Fill in blanks with appropriate pair of phrases:
The passage suggests that while a modern economist, considers it uneconomic to use ........ form of fuel, a Buddhist economist considers it uneconomic to use ....... from a fuel


All Chapters

View all Chapter and number of question available From each chapter from Section-Officer

Section Officer Model Exam1

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam2

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam3

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam4

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam5

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam6

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam7

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam8

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam9

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam10

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam11

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam12

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam13

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam14

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam15

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam16

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam17

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam18

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam19

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam20

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam21

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam22

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam23

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam24

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam25

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam26

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam27

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam28

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam29

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam30

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam31

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam32

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam33

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam34

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam35

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam36

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam37

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam38

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam39

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam40

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam41

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam42

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam43

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam44

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam45

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam46

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam47

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam48

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam49

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam50

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam51

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam52

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam53

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam54

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam55

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam56

Section Officer Model exam 1

Section Officer Model Exam 57

Section Officer Model Exam 57

Section Officer Model Exam 58

Section Officer Model Exam 58

Section Officer Model Exam 59

Section Officer Model Exam 59

Section Officer Model Exam 60

Section Officer Model Exam 60

Similar Question

This Chapter Section-Officer-Model-Exam56 consists of the following topics

based on the following passage
Modern economies does not differentiate between renewable and non-renewable materials, as its method is to measures everything by means of a money price. Thus, taking various alternative fuels, like coal, oil, wood or water power: the only difference between them recognised by modern economics is relative cost per equivalent unit. The cheapest is automatically the one to be preferred, as to do otherwise would be irrational and 'uneconomic'. From a Buddhist point of view of course this will not do, the essential difference between non-renewable fuels like coal and oil on the one hand and renewable fuels like wood and water power on the other cannot be simply overlooked. Non-renewable goods must be used only if they are indespensible, and then only with the greatest care and the highest concern for conservation. To use them carelessly or extravagantly is an act of violence, and while complete non-violence may not be possible on earth, it is nonetheless the duty of man to aim at deal of non-violence in all he does
In this passage the author is trying to

based on following passage
Modern economies does not differentiate between renewable and non-renewable materials, as its method is to measures everything by means of a money price. Thus, taking various alternative fuels, like coal, oil, wood or water power: only difference between m recognised by modern economics is relative cost per equivalent unit. The cheapest is automatically one to be preferred, as to do orwise would be irrational and 'uneconomic'. From a Buddhist point of view of course this will not do, essential difference between non-renewable fuels like coal and oil on one hand and renewable fuels like wood and water power on or cannot be simply overlooked. Non-renewable goods must be used only if y are indespensible, and n only with greatest care and highest concern for conservation. To use m carelessly or extravagantly is an act of violence, and while complete non-violence may not be possible on earth, it is noneless duty of man to aim at deal of non-violence in all he does
Fill in blanks with appropriate pair of phrases:
The passage suggests that while a modern economist, considers it uneconomic to use ........ form of fuel, a Buddhist economist considers it uneconomic to use ....... from a fuel

based on the following passage
Modern economies does not differentiate between renewable and non-renewable materials, as its method is to measures everything by means of a money price. Thus, taking various alternative fuels, like coal, oil, wood or water power: the only difference between them recognised by modern economics is relative cost per equivalent unit. The cheapest is automatically the one to be preferred, as to do otherwise would be irrational and 'uneconomic'. From a Buddhist point of view of course this will not do, the essential difference between non-renewable fuels like coal and oil on the one hand and renewable fuels like wood and water power on the other cannot be simply overlooked. Non-renewable goods must be used only if they are indespensible, and then only with the greatest care and the highest concern for conservation. To use them carelessly or extravagantly is an act of violence, and while complete non-violence may not be possible on earth, it is nonetheless the duty of man to aim at deal of non-violence in all he does
The Buddhist economist's attitude implies that fuels like coal and oil must be used only if

based on the following passage Modern economies does not differentiate between renewable and non-renewable materials

as its method is to measures everything by means of a money price. Thus

taking various alternative fuels

like coal

oil

wood or water power: the only difference between them recognised by modern economics is relative cost per equivalent unit. The cheapest is automatically the one to be preferred

as to do otherwise would be irrational and 'uneconomic'. From a Buddhist point of view of course this will not do

the essential difference between non-renewable fuels like coal and oil on the one hand and renewable fuels like wood and water power on the other cannot be simply overlooked. Non-renewable goods must be used only if they are indespensible

and then only with the greatest care and the highest concern for conservation. To use them carelessly or extravagantly is an act of violence

and while complete non-violence may not be possible on earth

it is nonetheless the duty of man to aim at deal of non-violence in all he does Fill in the blanks with the appropriate pair of phrases: The passage suggests that while a modern economist

considers it uneconomic to use ........ form of fuel

a Buddhist economist considers it uneconomic to use ....... from a fuel

Section Officer Model Exam56

Section-Officer